|
|
Jin, Z., & Külls, C. (2020). FDM based OA-ICOS for high accuracy 13C quantification in gaseous CO2. EES, 446(3), 032061.
|
|
|
|
Krüger, N., Külls, C., Bruggeman, A., Eliades, M., Christophi, C., Rigas, M., et al. (2020). Groundwater recharge estimates with soil isotope profiles-is there a bias on coarse-grained hillslopes? In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (9840).
|
|
|
|
Tziritis, E., Aschonitis, V., Balacco, G., Daras, P., Doulgeris, C., Fidelibus, M. D., et al. (2020). MEDSAL Project-Salinization of critical groundwater reserves in coastal Mediterranean areas: Identification, risk assessment and sustainable management with the use of integrated modelling and smart ICT tools. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (2326).
|
|
|
|
Doulgeris, C., Tziritis, E., Pisinaras, V., Panagopoulos, A., & Külls, C. (2020). Prediction of seawater intrusion to coastal aquifers based on non-dimensional diagrams. In EGU Geophysical Abstracts (4073).
|
|
|
|
Sahoo, S. K., Jha, V. N., Patra, A. C., Jha, S. K., & Kulkarni, M. S. (2020). Scientific background and methodology adopted on derivation of regulatory limit for uranium in drinking water – A global perspective. Environmental Advances, 2, 100020.
Abstract: Guideline values are prescribed for drinking water to ensure long term protection of the public against anticipated potential adverse effects. There is a great public and regulatory agencies interest in the guideline values of uranium due to its complex behavior in natural aquatic system and divergent guideline values across the countries. Wide variability in guideline values of uranium in drinking water may be attributed to toxicity reference point, variation in threshold values, uncertainty within intraspecies and interspecies, resource availability, socio-economic condition, variation in ingestion rate, etc. Although guideline values vary to a great extent, reasonable scientific basis and technical judgments are essential before it could be implemented. Globally guideline values are derived considering its radiological or chemical toxicity. Minimal or no adverse effect criterions are normally chosen as the basis for deriving the guideline values of uranium. In India, the drinking water limit of 60 µg/L has been estimated on the premise of its radiological concern. A guideline concentration of 2 µg/L is recommended in Japan while 1700 µg/L in Russia. The relative merit of different experimental assumption, scientific approach and its methodology adopted for derivation of guideline value of uranium in drinking water in India and other countries is discussed in the paper.
|
|
