|
|
Ardelt, G., Külls, C., & Hellbrück, H. (2018). Towards intrinsic molecular communication using isotopic isomerism. Open Journal of Internet Of Things (OJIOT), 4(1), 135–143.
|
|
|
|
Hu, K., Wang, Q., Tao, G., Wang, A., & Ding, D. (2011). Experimental Study on Restoration of Polluted Groundwater from in Situ Leaching Uranium Mining with Sulfate Reducing Bacteria and ZVI-SRB. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2, 150–155.
Abstract: In the case of in situ leaching of uranium, the primitive geochemical environment for groundwater is changed since leachant is injected into the water beaving uranium deposit. This increases the concentration of uranium and results in the groundwater contamination.Microbial reduction technology by Sulfate reducing bacteria and Zero Valent Iron were employed to treat uranium wastewater. The experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of anion (sulfate and nitrate) on dealing with uranium wastewater. Experimental results show that the utilization of both SRB system and ZVI – SRB system to process uranium wastewater is affected by sulfate ion and nitrate ion. As the concentration of sulfate radical is lower than 4000mg/L, sulfate-reducing bacteria has no influence on precipitated uranium. However, as the concentration of sulfate is more than 6,000mg/L, uranium removal rate decreases significantly, from 80% to 14.1%. When adding sulfate radical on ZVI – SRB system to process uranium wastewater, its uranium removal rate is higher than SRB system. Low concentration of nitrate contributes to reduction metabolism of SRB. High concentration of nitrate inhibits the growth and metabolism of SRB and affects the treatment efficiency of uranium wastewater. When the concentration of nitrate reaches 1500mg/L, uranium removal rate is less than 0.1%. Nevertheless, as the concentration of nitrate is lower than 1000mg/L, uranium removal rate could reach more than 75%. As existence of nitrate radical, uranium removal rate of SRB by adding ZVI is higher than that without adding.
|
|
|
|
Constantinou, C., & Udluft, P. (2000). Mapping the availability and dynamics of groundwater recharge. Part 2: Case studies from Mediterranean Basins. In Proceedings of Third Congress on Regional Geological Cartography and Information Systems (pp. 163–168).
|
|
|
|
Röttcher, K. (2018). In A. Michalke, M. Rambke, & S. Zeranski (Eds.), Risikomanagement und Nachhaltigkeit in der Wasserwirtschaft: Erfolgreiche Navigation durch die Komplexität und Dynamik des Risikos (pp. 165–174). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Abstract: Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden beispielhaft unterschiedliche Ansätze des Risikomanagements und das Verständnis von Nachhaltigkeit in der Wasserwirtschaft dargelegt. Die Darstellung richtet sich insbesondere an Leser aus anderen Fachdisziplinen, wie das Rechts- und Finanzwesen, den Fahrzeug- und Maschinenbau oder auch die sozialen Berufe. Die Zusammenhänge werden überblicksartig mit einzelnen konkreten Beispielen dargestellt mit dem Fokus auf die grundsätzlichen Denk- und Vorgehensweisen.
|
|
|
|
Voerkelius, S., Külls, C., Santiago, M. M. F., Frischkorn, H., dos Santos Semrau, L. A., Heinrichs, G., et al. (2003). Investigations on water management and water quality in Picos/PI and Tauá/CE. In Global change and regional impacts (pp. 173–184). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
|
|
