|
Davila, P., & Külls, C. (2010). Reliability of current CFC data for age dating of water. In EGU Geophysical Abstracts (536).
|
|
Davila, P., & Külls, C. (2009). Combined application of 85-Kr, 39-Ar with CFCs in contaminated aquifers. EGU Geophysical Abstracts, , 1074.
|
|
Külls, C., Marx, V., Bittner, A., Ellmies, R., & Seely, M. (2009). Environmental impacts on the hydrology of ephemeral streams and alluvial aquifers. In EGU Geophysical Abstracts (5517).
|
|
Klaus, J., & Külls, C. (2009). Integrating residence time data in mixing cell modeling-Application to the Lower Kuiseb Dune area. In EGU Geophysical Abstracts (11026).
|
Mekuria, W., & Tegegne, D. (2023). Water harvesting. In M. J. Goss, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment (Second Edition) (pp. 593–607). Oxford: Academic Press.
Abstract: Water harvesting is the intentional collection and concentration of rainwater and runoff to offset irrigation demands. Secondary benefits include decreased flood and erosion risk. Water harvesting techniques include micro- and macro-catchment systems, floodwater harvesting, and rooftop and groundwater harvesting. The techniques vary with catchment type and size, and the method of water storage. Micro-catchment water harvesting, for example, requires the development of small structures and targets increased water delivery and storage to the root zone whereas macro-catchment systems collect runoff water from large areas. The sustainability of water harvesting techniques at the local level are usually constrained by several factors such as labor, construction costs, loss of productive land, and maintenance, suggesting that multiple solutions are required to sustain the benefits of water harvesting techniques.
Keywords: Climate change, Ecosystem services, Environmental benefits, Population growth, Resilient community, Resilient environment, Socio-economic benefits, Urbanizations, Water harvesting, Water quality, Water security
|
