|
Külls, C. (2004). Demonstration des Potentials der Nitrat-Isotopenanalytik für die Strategieentwicklung der Sanierung Nitrat-belasteter Brunnen.
Abstract: Demonstration des Potentials der Nitrat-Isotopenanalytik für die Strategieentwicklung der Sanierung Nitrat-belasteter Brunnen
|
|
|
Zagana, E., Külls, C., & Udluft, P. (2000). Der Wasserhaushalt des Aliakmonas. Vom Wasser, 94, 29–39.
|
|
|
Adolph, G., Römer, T., & Külls, C. Deriving complex groundwater age structure by combining age dating and analytic element modelling. In G-DAT 2008-Leipzig (12).
|
|
|
Baram, S., Ronen, Z., Kurtzman, D., Külls, C., & Dahan, O. (2013). Desiccation-crack-induced salinization in deep clay sediment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(4), 1533.
|
|
|
Adolph, G., KÜlls, C., & Willscheid, A. (2007). Determination and validation of age structures as an improved measure of hydrological dynamics. In Geophysical Research Abstracts (Vol. 9).
|
|
|
Külls, C. J., & Ritter, M. (2010). Deuterium excess anomaly of precipitation in Svalbard. In American Geophysical Union (Vol. 2010, 51).
|
|
|
Emparanza, A. R., Kampmann, R., Caso, F. D., Morales, C., & Nanni, A. (2022). Durability assessment of GFRP rebars in marine environments. Construction and Building Materials, 329, 127028.
Abstract: Technologies developed over the last two decades have facilitated the use of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars as internal reinforcement for concrete structures, specially in coastal environments, mainly due to their corrosion resistance. To-date, most durability studies have focused on a single mechanical parameter (tensile strength) and a single aging environment (exposure to high alkalinity). However, knowledge gaps exists in understanding how other mechanical parameters and relevant conditioning environments may affect the durability of GFRP bars. To this end, this study assesses the durability for different physio-mechanical properties of GFRP rebars, post exposure to accelerated conditioning in seawater. Six different GFRP rebar types were submerged in seawater tanks, at various temperatures (23°C, 40°C and 60°C) for different time periods (60, 120, 210 and 365 days). In total six different physio-mechanical properties were assessed, including: tensile strength, E-modulus, transverse and horizontal shear strength, micro-structural composition and lastly, bond strength. It was inferred that rebars with high moisture absorption resulted in poor durability, in that it affected mainly the tensile strength. Based on the Arrhenius model, at 23°C all the rebars that met the acceptance criteria by ASTM D7957 are expected to retain 85% of the tensile strength capacity.
|
|
|
Dahan, O., Tatarsky, B., Enzel, Y., Külls, C., Seely, M., & Benito, G. (2008). Dynamics of flood water infiltration and ground water recharge in hyperarid desert. Groundwater, 46(3), 450–461.
|
|
|
Külls, C. (2014). Ecohydrological principles in economic models of water resources in drylands and desert restoration.
|
|
|
Paradis, C. J., Hoss, K. N., Meurer, C. E., Hatami, J. L., Dangelmayr, M. A., Tigar, A. D., et al. (2022). Elucidating mobilization mechanisms of uranium during recharge of river water to contaminated groundwater. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 251, 104076.
Abstract: The recharge of stream water below the baseflow water table can mobilize groundwater contaminants, particularly redox-sensitive and sorptive metals such as uranium. However, in-situ tracer experiments that simulate the recharge of stream water to uranium-contaminated groundwater are lacking, thus limiting the understanding of the potential mechanisms that control the mobility of uranium at the field scale. In this study, a field tracer test was conducted by injecting 100 gal (379 l) of oxic river water into a nearby suboxic and uranium-contaminated aquifer. The traced river water was monitored for 18 days in the single injection well and in the twelve surrounding observation wells. Mobilization of uranium from the solid to the aqueous phase was not observed during the tracer test despite its pre-test presence being confirmed on the aquifer sediments from lab-based acid leaching. However, strong evidence of oxidative immobilization of iron and manganese was observed during the tracer test and suggested that immobile uranium was likely in its oxidized state as U(VI) on the aquifer sediments; these observations ruled out oxidation of U(IV) to U(VI) as a potential mobilization mechanism. Therefore, desorption of U(VI) appeared to be the predominant potential mobilization mechanism, yet it was clearly not solely dependent on concentration as evident when considering that uranium-poor river water (\textless0.015 mg/L) was recharged to uranium-rich groundwater (≈1 mg/L). It was possible that uranium desorption was limited by the relatively higher pH and lower alkalinity of the river water as compared to the groundwater; both factors favor immobilization. However, it was likely that the immobile uranium was associated with a mineral phase, as opposed to a sorbed phase, thus desorption may not have been possible. The results of this field tracer study successfully ruled out two common mobilization mechanisms of uranium: (1) oxidative dissolution and (2) concentration-dependent desorption and ruled in the importance of advection, dispersion, and the mineral phase of uranium.
|
|