|
|
Röttcher, K. (2018). In A. Michalke, M. Rambke, & S. Zeranski (Eds.), Risikomanagement und Nachhaltigkeit in der Wasserwirtschaft: Erfolgreiche Navigation durch die Komplexität und Dynamik des Risikos (pp. 165–174). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Abstract: Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden beispielhaft unterschiedliche Ansätze des Risikomanagements und das Verständnis von Nachhaltigkeit in der Wasserwirtschaft dargelegt. Die Darstellung richtet sich insbesondere an Leser aus anderen Fachdisziplinen, wie das Rechts- und Finanzwesen, den Fahrzeug- und Maschinenbau oder auch die sozialen Berufe. Die Zusammenhänge werden überblicksartig mit einzelnen konkreten Beispielen dargestellt mit dem Fokus auf die grundsätzlichen Denk- und Vorgehensweisen.
|
|
|
|
Mekuria, W., & Tegegne, D. (2023). Water harvesting. In M. J. Goss, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment (Second Edition) (pp. 593–607). Oxford: Academic Press.
Abstract: Water harvesting is the intentional collection and concentration of rainwater and runoff to offset irrigation demands. Secondary benefits include decreased flood and erosion risk. Water harvesting techniques include micro- and macro-catchment systems, floodwater harvesting, and rooftop and groundwater harvesting. The techniques vary with catchment type and size, and the method of water storage. Micro-catchment water harvesting, for example, requires the development of small structures and targets increased water delivery and storage to the root zone whereas macro-catchment systems collect runoff water from large areas. The sustainability of water harvesting techniques at the local level are usually constrained by several factors such as labor, construction costs, loss of productive land, and maintenance, suggesting that multiple solutions are required to sustain the benefits of water harvesting techniques.
Keywords: Climate change, Ecosystem services, Environmental benefits, Population growth, Resilient community, Resilient environment, Socio-economic benefits, Urbanizations, Water harvesting, Water quality, Water security
|
|
|
|
Mekuria, W., & Tegegne, D. (2023). Water harvesting. In M. J. Goss, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment (Second Edition) (pp. 593–607). Oxford: Academic Press.
Abstract: Water harvesting is the intentional collection and concentration of rainwater and runoff to offset irrigation demands. Secondary benefits include decreased flood and erosion risk. Water harvesting techniques include micro- and macro-catchment systems, floodwater harvesting, and rooftop and groundwater harvesting. The techniques vary with catchment type and size, and the method of water storage. Micro-catchment water harvesting, for example, requires the development of small structures and targets increased water delivery and storage to the root zone whereas macro-catchment systems collect runoff water from large areas. The sustainability of water harvesting techniques at the local level are usually constrained by several factors such as labor, construction costs, loss of productive land, and maintenance, suggesting that multiple solutions are required to sustain the benefits of water harvesting techniques.
Keywords: Climate change, Ecosystem services, Environmental benefits, Population growth, Resilient community, Resilient environment, Socio-economic benefits, Urbanizations, Water harvesting, Water quality, Water security
|
|
|
|
Külls, C., & Schwarz, O. (2000). Grundwasseranreicherung in den Waldbeständen der Teninger Allmend bei Freiburg im Breisgau. In Beiträge zur Physischen Geographie (pp. 67–78). Frankfurt am Main: Werner-F. Bär.
|
|
|
|
Illgen, M., & Ackermann, H. (2019). In S. Köster, M. Reese, & J. ’e Zuo (Eds.), Urban Flood Prevention: Technical and Institutional Aspects from Chinese and German Perspective (pp. 173–193). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Abstract: Today’s cities face the challenge of climate change adaptation worldwide. In this context, prevention of damage caused by flash floods plays an important role. This requires a cooperative pluvial flood risk management approach, which includes planning, technical, and administrative measures and involves preliminary flood risk analyses. This article outlines the main components of this risk management approach, which has proven its effectiveness in Europe. The recommendations formulated for this purpose are applicable or adaptable to regions with other constraints, such as China, for example.
|
|
|
|
Doulgeris, C., Tziritis, E., Pisinaras, V., Panagopoulos, A., & Külls, C. (2020). Prediction of seawater intrusion to coastal aquifers based on non-dimensional diagrams. In EGU Geophysical Abstracts (4073).
|
|
|
|
Leibundgut, C., Maloszewski, P., & Külls, C. (2009). Tracers in Hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Külls, C. (2001). Groundwater of the North-Western Kalahari, Namibia: estimation of recharge and quantification of the flow system. Doctoral thesis, Hydrogeologie und Umwelt, .
|
|
|
|
Döll, P., Krol, M., Fuhr, D., Gaiser, T., Herfort, J., Höynck, S., et al. (2003). Integrated scenarios of regional development in Ceará and Piauí. In Global Change and Regional Impacts (pp. 19–41). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
|
|
|
|
Voerkelius, S., Külls, C., Santiago, M. M. F., Frischkorn, H., dos Santos Semrau, L. A., Heinrichs, G., et al. (2003). Investigations on water management and water quality in Picos/PI and Tauá/CE. In Global change and regional impacts (pp. 173–184). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
|
|
